NGMA- Bengal School Of Art

So, the night before class we got a mail from Narendra saying that we don’t have to come to class tomorrow, instead we need to go to National Gallery Of Modern Art and see the exhibition on the Bengal school of art.
I was very happy, because for me NGMA is just like home. The feel of the place is so fresh and warm, and the yum food at the canteen is just a plus.

So, we all planned our trip and reached NGMA by 11 in the morning. We got our tickets and walked in. I had Fine Arts in 11^th and 12^th grade in school , so I had my background study on Bengal school of art.

Bengal school of art came into being in the early 20^th century to renew the Indian style of art. It was started by Abanindranath Tagore, who thought that because of colonialism, the artists were getting influenced by the western art and were losing their Indian touch. He wanted to change that. He wanted to draw inspiration from asia and bring a new style of art. He was offered a lot of support by EB Havell, the principal of art school of Calcutta and a few other Europeans.
There were a lot of paintings that I had read about in the textbooks, but finally seeing them was just incredible!

Paintings like seven figures by Rabindranath Tagore captured my eye. They were so simplistic yet beautiful. I had read about and seen Gaganendranath Tagore’s Magician painting and I loved how he used cubism to showcase the rush of the city. That is why I was absorbed by his Fairy In The Moonlight, Himalayan Bride.

Nandalal Bose’s Santhal Harvest and Bapu also caught my attention. I loved the technique of woodcut that he had used.

Jamini Roy is again one of my favourite artists. The way he uses his bold strokes and strong, bright colours is astonishing. Also, he uses a lot of Indian motifs in his paintings and that gives the paintings an Indian essence.

There were a lot of other artists as well like Avtar Singh Panwar and Bb Mukherjee, whose works were also showcased.

Bengal school of art, according to me comprised a lot of miniature art, Romantic- misty scenes, Rural settings, portraits. I also like how the wash technique from Japan was used in so many of the paintings.

As we walked out, we all were in for another treat! There was another on-going exhibition showcasing the works of Amrita Shergill, which took us to another new world. 

Final Installation

For our final installation, we were given complete freedom to work any way we wanted to. Narendra wanted us to create the sort of installation we wanted to make. We could work individually or in groups.

I wanted to work with light, because I was influenced a lot by the effect of Yayoi Kusama’s installation. I wanted to play with light and see all that it could do. Being a student of science background, I knew about a few experiments that I could work with. Like the double slit experiment. I also thought about making a huge prism or filling the room with kaleidoscopes. But, one of the criteria was that the cost of our installation should be minimum. And every idea that I got, was costing a lot.

So, I thought of doing something else.
Barkha and I thought of doing the installation together. She wanted to work with her idea of small leaves. We started thinking of ways to put our ideas together, but got no place. We both had a mind block.

A day before we had to start working on our installation, I was reading news and came across another absurd theory related to the Malaysian airlines MH370, and thought of doing an art installation for that cause.
I shared the idea with Barkha, and we both thought of doing a huge dream catcher. It would not be the usual dream catcher, but it would be our representation of it. And there would be creepers with leaves coming on it from behind. The more we thought about it, the less the creepers made sense. We liked the visual of birds more.
So, the next day we started thinking more on the line of bird. We thought of combining birds and the dream catcher.

Then, Barkha had the idea of making exactly the same amount of birds as the number of passengers and crew in MH370, which were 239. We both got really excited about this idea, and definitely wanted to take it ahead.
We wanted to work with origami. So, we looked up the method of making origami cranes. We got white butter paper about 8 sheets (5 rupees each, so the minimum cost criteria got checked out).

We both were then joined in by Anahita also. So, it was the three of us who had to make the 239 origami birds. Over the course of 1 week we made these 239 birds.
On the day of the final installation, we first finalised the site of our installation. We chose the staircase on between the first and second floor. We wanted to hang the birds from the ceiling above those stairs, and the windows just added to the aesthetics.

So we started stringing each crane and got the ladder to put them up using masking tape. What we did not realise was that it was going to take us the entire day to do that. We had a pattern in mind; we wanted to show movement of the cranes. And for that we had to alter the height of the string for each crane.

Around 4o’ clock we presented our installation to the class.

Pictures of our final installation :

Our concept note:
Amidst all the conspiracies that surround the disappearance of flight MH370, one can very easily forget the 239 people (including passengers and crew) whose lives are being treated with insignificance, the people whose families haven’t got any closure after the flight went missing, the people who have become a faceless number in the news. This is a small way to give a face to each life, and to let them know that they aren’t forgotten. Take a minute to look at the mass above you.

Each crane is a life.

Day 7

We were supposed to research and then choose any five artists who we find inspirational and present their works in class. The following are the installation artists who i chose.

FIREFLIES ON THE WATER- Yayoi Kusama
Yayoi Kusama works with polka dots, usually. 

I really liked this installation of hers because of the way she has used lights to create the sense of infinite space.
She has used LED lights, reflective surfaces like mirror and water to create some thing so extra ordinary.


FORGOTTEN SONGS-Michael Thomas Hill

The installation is located in Sydney, Australia. It is installed between buildings, the display is actually meant to bring attention to native birds and the loss of their habitats, which is a main problem attributed to bird extinction.

He has put up about 50 empty bird cages. When one walks under them, they can hear the sounds of these birds. Their calls change from sunrise to sunset. Their names are also inscribed on stones kept on the road. 

FOREVER BICYCLE- AI WEIWEI

Ai Wei Wei has taken 3,144 bicycle frames and put them in a way to give an incredible visual effect. They give the idea of being in fast motion. He wants to bring to attention the fact that the entire world is moving too fast and the social environment of the world is changing, especially China.

THE FALLEN - ANDY MOSS AND JAMIE WARDLEY

These two British artist created a very strong visual on D-Day landing beach of Arromanche in France, on the peace day. This was their tribute to all the soldiers who lost their lives on that day during World War II. They made 9000 stencils, and with the help of volunteers they raked sand to get the figures. The installation was washed away by the tides in a short while. 

SILENT EVOLUTION- JASON DeCAIRES TAYLOR

The artist is famous for creating eco-sculptures. These living sculptures act like artificial reefs which attract corals and eventually increases the marine life. I really like how he has combined environment with art. 

    

Day 6

A week after watching those 3 films, we were divided into three groups and each group got a question.
Group one:  Who is the artist? The one who makes the film or the one who acts in it.
Group two:  Compare the art of direction between Pollock and Rothko’s film.
Group three: Discuss the artistic process.

I was in group one. By this time, we had already realised that Who is the artist is one of the most difficult (and Narendra’s favourite) question. So, when we all sat as a group, we had no idea what to say. Because this question can be answered in so many ways, yet none of them seems completely true.

We discussed the films and tried to relate the question to them. Artist according to us, was everyone involved in making the film as well as the person it was based on. ‘Artist’ is a term too diverse to be used for a specific job.
In making of the film also, a lot of work had to be put. Script writing, shooting, direction, lighting, and all of this, according to us is art. So, we categorized all of them as artists. Then, the person on whom the film was based is also an artist because of the work they did.

While discussing our findings, a lot of question were raised, especially about the hierarchy system for the artists. What defines this hierarchy? Is it the skill or something else?  And is it fair if the films sell because of the artist (actor) involved instead of the director. According to me, it is very subjective. In the commercial sector of films, the films usually sell because of the actors involved, because for a layman to think about the script writer or to know the director is very unusual. But, if you are into the artistic field, then your outlook changes accordingly.

Then, we moved on to other question and groups. One of the groups talked about documentaries and docu-fictions (something which I had never heard about).  According to this group, a film can only be called a documentary if it is shot at the time when the action is happening. It cannot be something that is being re-created or re-told, even if it is without change.
If some event is being re-told, then it will be called a docu-fiction.
There was a lot of debate on this topic.

We also discussed about the artistic processes, and if art can be created by doing something without having a conscious sense about it. According to me, it is alright if someone creates something and later finds meaning in it (while doing it or after finishing it).

This is one of the things that I love about Narendra’s classes, no matter what the topic of discussion is, all our debates lead onto something very different yet very related.

For the next class, we were all asked to think about what sort of installation we would like to do, and research and present 5 installation artists whose works we like.

Day 5 and Artistic Processes

After the loooooong break from class, Narendra decided to give us an easy day. So, we saw three films.
In The Mood For Love which was a film based on the south Asian politics. The artist has made the film in a ay that it can be treated commercial as well as artistic. It is upto the viewer to derive the meaning out of the film. Then we saw two films based on the lives of Mark Rothko and Jackson Pollock.
We were then asked to write a reflective note on what we think an artistic process is.

When I thought of becoming an artist/ designer at the age of 10, I thought that I would just walk up to a pretty landscape, put up my easel and paint. A term like Artistic process was not present in my dictionary. It wasn’t until very recently that it came into existence.

I did not think that the thought process that goes behind an art work could actually be the art itself. In our last class, we were made to watch the art processes of Mark Rothko and Jackson Pollock. Then, we all started to think about what an art process should be like.

After watching both the documentaries I was wondering if the art process had to be like theirs. Both the artists were unbound, easily inflammable, full of passion and mad.
If a layman were to see their art works, he would most probably laugh it off and say ‘a 5 year old could do that.’
But only after you see what got them to do what they did, would you see their artistic process.

According to me, an artistic process is subjective to everyone. One person’s artistic process can be completely different from the others. There is no way of saying that someone’s art process is wrong or right. It is something that goes on in the mind of the artist and no one can change it.

How Rothko and Pollock arrived at their art pieces is personal to both of them. Rothko bared down his art to just basic colours. He made his work minimalistic. Whereas, Pollock worked with abstract expressionism.

Mark Rothko was one of those artists who sat in front of his art piece, smoking his cigarette and just contemplating his next move. Whereas, Pollock was one of those artists who went with the flow and got annoyed when anybody stopped him.
Both of them wanted things to be done their way and if anything went out of place, they would lose their cool.
According to me, one’s artistic process begins when he starts to think about his basic idea and goes on until he delivers his final piece. The thought and work that goes into his piece donates to his process. Every mistake that one makes, adds to the learning. This, according to me is the best way of finding your place. Only when one makes mistakes, again and again does he figure out what he can do and what he aims to do.

While watching the film based on Pollock I came across a few things that I liked. I like the fact that he did not work for an audience. When he was working, he did not want anything or anybody to break his spontaneity.  When one of his paintings was selected to be displayed in four seasons, he went there to sit and observe the space. When he saw the kind of people who went and ate there, he said ‘Anybody who eats that kind of food with that kind of money would never look at my painting.’ and with that he refused to put up his painting there.

Hence, everyone has a different artistic process depending on the way they see and perceive things.

I do not know what kind of an artist process I am going to choose as right now I am just experimenting and trying to figure out what I want to do. Maybe this itself would be my artistic process. I am not sure. But, I am sure one day I will.

Day four

In our fourth class, we were divided into three groups. And each group got a topic to debate about.
group one:  Conceptual Art
group two: Pop Art
group three: Minimalism

I was in the minimalism art. We started researching and debating about it, and came across the fact that minimalism is actually a form of art created as a form of revolt against Abstract Expressionism.
Artist stripped down their art to basic forms.



Donald Judd’s art
Sol LeWitt's Art

Minimalism is using the basic forms, but they can be repeated as well as played around with.
While reading and looking at the art, we also saw how a form of art which was made to oppose abstract expressionism has slowly mixed with it and become abstract as well.
We also talked about Andy Warhol’s pop art and how the underlying meaning of capitalism comes across.

Then, the groups were reversed. The group of conceptual art had to do an installation based on pop art and vice versa. Whereas, our group had to do an installation based on Abstract expressionism. Abstract expressionism was the form of art that developed in America post world war II. It brought upon the idea of surrealism, and the emotional state of mind of the artist.

My group: Me, Anahita Ganjoo, Barkha Gupta and Priyank Malukar.
We thought of doing something spontaneous and in the moment. We wanted to do a Jackson Pollock with the materials that we had.
So, we went on the terrace and took the materials available to us. We found coconut husk and sand and started working with it.

Our concept note:
This piece of art depicts the most common of the problems faced in life. Making decision based on the current situation. The husk can be seen as the state of our minds. Just like its texture, it’s chaotic and wavering.The shift in shadow depicts situations that we can contemplate. The wind can be seen as spontaneous events that spring up in our lives randomly. The combination of both these forces bring about a disturbance in our so-called ‘plans’. The empty spaces between the mud signify how void our plans feel retrospectively because we poured the mud in reference to the husk’s past position.